<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A little bit of politics - part two</title>
	<link>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/</link>
	<description>The adventures of a British jazz singer in Malaysia. Words and music by Andrea Mann.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 08:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Watch movies online</title>
		<link>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-1725</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch movies online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-1725</guid>
		<description>I’ll right away snatch your rss feed as I can't in finding your e-mail subscription link or e-newsletter service. Do you've any? Please let me realize so that I may subscribe. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ll right away snatch your rss feed as I can&#8217;t in finding your e-mail subscription link or e-newsletter service. Do you&#8217;ve any? Please let me realize so that I may subscribe. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Werderman</title>
		<link>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-1679</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Werderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 13:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-1679</guid>
		<description>Love your writing style.  Will you consider writing for my blog as a guest writer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your writing style.  Will you consider writing for my blog as a guest writer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free magazines by mail</title>
		<link>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-1661</link>
		<dc:creator>free magazines by mail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-1661</guid>
		<description>Very good report,I anticipate many more post from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good report,I anticipate many more post from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-768</guid>
		<description>btw, I would be joining in with the debate, but I'm just too beat. bear with me while I get my mojo back...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw, I would be joining in with the debate, but I&#8217;m just too beat. bear with me while I get my mojo back&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-767</guid>
		<description>oi! you lot! it's chucking out time! if you wanna keep talking politics go to Pete's pub over 'ere:  http://peterthompson.wordpress.com/. the landlord's a bit dodgy, but it's a lovely gaff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oi! you lot! it&#8217;s chucking out time! if you wanna keep talking politics go to Pete&#8217;s pub over &#8216;ere:  <a href="http://peterthompson.wordpress.com/." rel="nofollow">http://peterthompson.wordpress.com/.</a> the landlord&#8217;s a bit dodgy, but it&#8217;s a lovely gaff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Thompson</title>
		<link>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-766</guid>
		<description>And anyway, Fukuyama says that plenty of turmoil and war will take place after the end of history but it cannot and should not lead to any new social system. Socialism is mabe still on the agenda but I certainly want to see the reduction of religion as an alternative to secular democracy, be it Christian Muslim or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And anyway, Fukuyama says that plenty of turmoil and war will take place after the end of history but it cannot and should not lead to any new social system. Socialism is mabe still on the agenda but I certainly want to see the reduction of religion as an alternative to secular democracy, be it Christian Muslim or whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Thompson</title>
		<link>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-765</guid>
		<description>Is wrong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Thompson</title>
		<link>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-764</guid>
		<description>Yes, I know Fukuyama and that book. I used to think it was completely wrong but now I'm not so sure. At the moment we do indeed appear to have arrived at some sort of end point an it is indeed difficult to see where it can go from here, but that is no reason to give up. The only question is whether we can move forward to a global democracy which includes all forms of social and religious thought (what Bloch calls a social multi-verse) but will essentially be enlghtened and secular and liberal, or whether the forces that want the world to be subordinate to needs of capital but who use the language of democracy and liberalism as fig-leaves for the expansionist aims force us in that direction at the point of a gun. My feeling is that just because Bush says it is all about defending freedom then we should challenge him and say that wat he means is the freedom to opn the world for business. What we must mean by them is to open the world to human freedom, in which the economy becomes our servant rather than our master. But I don't think that in the name of anti-imperialism we must accept what other anti-iperialists wish to impose on the rest of us (I mean the idea of the global Islamic Caliphate which some would like to see).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I know Fukuyama and that book. I used to think it was completely wrong but now I&#8217;m not so sure. At the moment we do indeed appear to have arrived at some sort of end point an it is indeed difficult to see where it can go from here, but that is no reason to give up. The only question is whether we can move forward to a global democracy which includes all forms of social and religious thought (what Bloch calls a social multi-verse) but will essentially be enlghtened and secular and liberal, or whether the forces that want the world to be subordinate to needs of capital but who use the language of democracy and liberalism as fig-leaves for the expansionist aims force us in that direction at the point of a gun. My feeling is that just because Bush says it is all about defending freedom then we should challenge him and say that wat he means is the freedom to opn the world for business. What we must mean by them is to open the world to human freedom, in which the economy becomes our servant rather than our master. But I don&#8217;t think that in the name of anti-imperialism we must accept what other anti-iperialists wish to impose on the rest of us (I mean the idea of the global Islamic Caliphate which some would like to see).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Gillespie</title>
		<link>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Gillespie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-763</guid>
		<description>I like you’re article a lot. Do you know Fukuyama’s polemic The End of History &#38; the Last Man? It proposes that Hagel’s dialectic is resolved in the ultimate virtue of Liberal Democracy. Obviously this idea has been undercut by 2001 onward, but it still sticks somehow, esp with the likes Choen &#38; his cohorts on the Euston Manifesto.  

The problem is that Enlightenment thinking seems to have got caught in an ethical cul-de-sac. How is it that a belief in equality makes us superior?

And the analogy of enlightenment = lightness &#38; faith = darkness reinforces the sort of supremacist twaddle typified in White Man’s Burden, i.e. we rational Europeans must save the savages! Or at the very least, nick their produce &#38; teach them cricket (&#38; then accuse them of cheating when they win).

Back to Berker Band, Afgan women’s rights only mattered to western liberals when the Taliban refused to acquiesce to American interests in 2001. No one gave a rat’s arce about them before. In the same way as nobody particular cared about the homosexuals of Iran until Ahmadinejad started enriching his uranium. It is this pernicious brand of neo-conservatism gift wrapped as Humanism that is so leathal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like you’re article a lot. Do you know Fukuyama’s polemic The End of History &amp; the Last Man? It proposes that Hagel’s dialectic is resolved in the ultimate virtue of Liberal Democracy. Obviously this idea has been undercut by 2001 onward, but it still sticks somehow, esp with the likes Choen &amp; his cohorts on the Euston Manifesto.  </p>
<p>The problem is that Enlightenment thinking seems to have got caught in an ethical cul-de-sac. How is it that a belief in equality makes us superior?</p>
<p>And the analogy of enlightenment = lightness &amp; faith = darkness reinforces the sort of supremacist twaddle typified in White Man’s Burden, i.e. we rational Europeans must save the savages! Or at the very least, nick their produce &amp; teach them cricket (&amp; then accuse them of cheating when they win).</p>
<p>Back to Berker Band, Afgan women’s rights only mattered to western liberals when the Taliban refused to acquiesce to American interests in 2001. No one gave a rat’s arce about them before. In the same way as nobody particular cared about the homosexuals of Iran until Ahmadinejad started enriching his uranium. It is this pernicious brand of neo-conservatism gift wrapped as Humanism that is so leathal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Thompson</title>
		<link>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lostintransposition.com/2008/02/27/a-little-bit-of-politics-part-two/#comment-758</guid>
		<description>Ha! brilliant. BUT, to quote from a report and interview with them:

"- It was a lot of fun, but also very scary. Afghanistan is still a very dangerous place for modern women, and when we shot the video we had to do it very discreetely because no one could know that we were playing music, says Nargiz." And they wear the burka not only in self-mocking irony but also because it protets their identity from the fundamentalists! My point precisely I think!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! brilliant. BUT, to quote from a report and interview with them:</p>
<p>&#8220;- It was a lot of fun, but also very scary. Afghanistan is still a very dangerous place for modern women, and when we shot the video we had to do it very discreetely because no one could know that we were playing music, says Nargiz.&#8221; And they wear the burka not only in self-mocking irony but also because it protets their identity from the fundamentalists! My point precisely I think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

